TheTourAttraction.com aims to provide the latest global travel and free travel news, travel and visa policies, and flight information. We hope to provide insights into tourism market, technology and development trends with everyone by providing the latest relevant information. Despite the raging COVID-19 epidemic in 2020, we always firmly believe that mankind will overcome the disease and the tourism market will definitely recover. TheTourAttraction.com look forward to your attention and support, and witness the development of the global tourism industry with us. Looking forward to the information TheTourAttraction.com provide can help you. We will continue to follow up and obtain the latest data, and look forward to your attention and support.
The following is the [Travel News]: Lawsuit claims Booking.com violated privacy laws by recording users’ telephone conversations from [Law.com] recommended by TheTourAttraction.com:
Plaintiff and California Class members are entitled to recovery actual and statutory damages in the amount of $5,000.00 per violation.
Booking.com was hit with a consumer class action on Tuesday in California Central District Court. The complaint, filed by the Kazerouni Law Group, accuses the defendant of recording users’ telephone conversations without notice or consent in violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act. Counsel have not yet appeared for the defendant. The case is 2:22-cv-05154, Siani v. Booking.com (USA) Inc.
According to factual allegations, on or about November 29, 2021, Plaintiff visited Booking.com’s website to book a hotel room at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, Nevada. Shortly before the scheduled booking, Plaintiff fell ill and was therefore no longer able to travel. As a result, Plaintiff called Defendant’s customer service line a couple of times in an attempt to cancel his hotel reservation.
On or about January 26, 2022, Plaintiff called Defendant’s phone number (917) 421-7241 from his cellular telephone number ending in “3299” for further assistance with canceling his reservation.
Plaintiff was not informed at the outset of the call that the call was or would be recorded. It was not until Plaintiff inquired later during the call (i.e., approximately three quarters of the way into the call) as to whether the call was recorded that Plaintiff was informed that the call was in fact being recorded.
This came as a shock to Plaintiff, and he was upset that Defendant had not informed him that the call would be audio recorded. Through Defendant’s aforementioned conduct, Plaintiff suffered an invasion of a legally protected interest in privacy, which is specifically addressed and protected by California law.
Plaintiff claims that Plaintiff and California Class members are entitled to recovery actual and statutory damages in the amount of $5,000.00 per violation.